Paul Usoro & Co Secures Legal Victory at the Lagos State High Court for Access Bank and Marina Securities Ltd

Paul Usoro & Co Secures Legal Victory at the Lagos State High Court for Access Bank and Marina Securities Ltd

 

In a high-stakes legal battle spanning over 10 years, the Lagos State High Court on Friday, 13 December 2024, dismissed all the claims brought against Access Bank Plc and Marina Securities Ltd, a testament to the skill, expertise, and determination that define the firm’s practice.

The Case

The claim involved allegations of breach of contract and professional negligence in the handling of shares used as collateral for a loan. The stakes were monumental—over a billion naira in damages was claimed.

The Defence

PUC’s legal team, led by Mr. Obafolahan Ojibara, one of the firm’s partners and assisted by our associate, Mercy Agbo, with a posse of over 15 other lawyers who worked on the matter over the years under the Firm’s Corporate Commercial Section, argued against the Claimant’s attempt to impose obligations beyond the written terms of the contract, which the Court ultimately agreed were unwarranted. Anchoring their arguments on the principle of pacta sunt servanda (agreements must be kept), our lawyers established that the clients had acted within the bounds of the contract and were not liable for the claims.

Challenges and Triumphs

This case focused on a highly niched contract type known as Margin Trading. The proceedings traversed several judicial divisions, from Igbosere to Ikeja and then, Badagry. Despite numerous setbacks, including more than ten unfavourable rulings and an interlocutory appeal, the team’s resilience paid off. Through innovative legal strategies and a meticulously crafted Final Address, PUC secured a judgment that dismissed all claims and reinforced key principles of contract law.

The Judgment

The Court upheld PUC’s submissions, rejecting attempts to introduce esoteric trade customs into a written contract. The Court also rejected the testimonies of the three experts called by the Claimant during trial and found that the said testimonies had been entirely impeached by PUC under cross examination. This victory reaffirms the sanctity of written agreements and sets a significant precedent for future cases involving complex financial instruments.

A Testament to Excellence

This outcome underscores the superior training, strategic thinking, and legal acumen that PUC instils in its lawyers. The firm’s commitment to excellence remains unwavering, with this landmark judgment serving as yet another highlight in its storied history of success in high-stakes litigation and commercial Practice.


For further inquiries about our litigation expertise, contact info@paulusoro.com

PUC Records Another Victory for Access Bank PLC

PUC Records Victory for Access Bank PLC in respect of Claims for Retirement Benefits, Compensation, and Sundry Reliefs to the Tune of ₦459,592,456.07

Paul Usoro and Co (“PUC”) successfully represented Access Bank Plc – the erstwhile employer of Mr Benson Oraelosi – Former General Manager of the defunct Diamond Bank Plc (Now Access Bank Plc) in Suit No. NICN/LA/109/2020: Mr Benson Oraelosi v. Access Bank Plc at the National Industrial Court of Nigeria (“NICN”), Lagos Judicial Division in a well-considered Judgment delivered by Honourable Justice (Prof) Oji on 22 February 2023. The Suit, was at the instance of Mr. Benson Oraelosi, as Claimant against the Defendant seeking Retirement entitlements, compensation and sundry reliefs in the cumulative sum of N459,592,456.07 (Four Hundred and Fifty-nine Million, Five Hundred and Ninety-two Thousand, Four Hundred and Fifty-six Naira and Seven Kobo).

The Suit emanated from the Claimant’s voluntary resignation/termination of his contract with the Defendant upon the merger of the defunct Diamond Bank Plc with Access Bank Plc. The Claimant, after his “resignation”, claimed his terminal entitlements pursuant to the Defendant’s 2006 Policy Manual which he vehemently alleged to be the applicable Manual at the time of his exit from the Defendant in 2019. The claims against the Defendant include; (i) a declaration that the Defendant’s action of calculating the Claimant’s retirement benefits under the Retirement Policy Scheme that came into effect in 2017 is void and of no effect having regard to the provision  of the Defendant’s extant Human Capital Management Policies and Procedures Handbook of 2006, (ii) a declaration that the Claimant is entitled to have his retirement benefits and entitlements calculated under the Retirement Policy Scheme of the Defendant’s Human Capital Handbook of 13 March 2006, (iii) a declaration that the Claimant is entitled to enjoy all the benefits and entitlements which accrued to him as an employee of the Defendant pursuant to the Defendant’s Human Capital Handbook of 13 March 2006, (iv) an Order directing the Defendant to pay the Claimant the sum of N328,331,881.24 (Three Hundred and Twenty-eight Million, Three Hundred and Thirty-one Thousand, Eight Hundred and Eighty-one Naira and Twenty-four Kobo) representing the Claimant’s three months compensation for each completed year of service as stipulated in the 2006 Manual and other sundry reliefs cumulatively totalling the sum of N459,592,456.07 (Four Hundred and Fifty-nine Million, Five Hundred and Ninety-two Thousand, Four Hundred and Fifty-six Naira and Seven Kobo) as monetary claims.

The crux of the Claimant’s claim was that his exit from the Defendant was a voluntary retirement pursuant to the 2006 Manual having spent an unbroken period of 25 years and was above 45 years at the time of his exit from the Defendant’s employ. On the contrary, the Defendant’s position was that the 2006 Manual was reviewed in 2014, and subsequently in 2017, being the extant Manual at the point of the Claimant’s exit from the Bank in 2019. The Claimant made a heavy weather of the fact that he was not personally advised of the review of the said 2017 policy, but he admitted the receipt of the sum of N57,000,000(Fifty-seven Million Naira) which was paid to him as retirement/ gratuity upon the review of the said policy.

The Court upon a holistic consideration and evaluation of the parties’ case, agreed with the Defendant that the applicable Human Capital Policy at the time of the exit of the Claimant from the Defendant was the 2017 Manual. Consequently, the Honourable Court refused all the monetary claims of the Claimant against the Defendant.

Apart from the illuminating questions of law and facts that were in issue PUC has re-affirmed its mastery to competently defend the interests of her Clients in labour and related matters and indeed, all spectra of the legal system.


For more enquiries, contact:

PUC’s Financial Services, Arbitration, Corporate law and Tax (FACT) Practice Section

  1.  Mr. Munirudeen LiadiPartner and Team Lead: munirudeen.liadi@paulusoro.com
  2. Inyenebong EtefiaAssociate: inyeneobong.etefia@paulusoro.com